Ashby vs Greenhouse
Ashby and Greenhouse are both HR & recruiting tools. Here is how they compare on pricing, audience, platforms and community votes.
All-in-one recruiting software
Structured hiring ATS
| Pricing | Paid · $400 | Paid |
| Built for | Small businesses, Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Platforms | web | web |
| Country | US · 2018 | US · 2012 |
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
| Rating | — | — |
Ashby
Ashby is an all-in-one recruiting platform from a San Francisco startup founded in 2018. It combines an applicant tracking system, a candidate CRM with sourcing, automated interview scheduling and a recruiting analytics engine in a single product. Fast-growing technology companies adopted it because it removed the need for separate tools for scheduling (such as GoodTime), sourcing outreach (such as Gem) and reporting.
Hiring teams get structured pipelines with scorecards, approvals for jobs and offers, email sequences to passive candidates, self-scheduling and panel coordination across interviewer calendars, and AI-assisted application review and interview notes. Analytics are the main differentiator: recruiting ops teams can build custom reports on funnel conversion, time to hire, source quality and interviewer load without exporting data. Pricing scales with company size: the Foundations plan for companies up to 100 employees starts at $400 a month, larger tiers are quoted, and advanced analytics, scheduling and CRM capabilities sit in higher tiers.
Ashby fits companies where hiring is continuous and a dedicated recruiting team exists. Configuration takes effort, and the price is hard to justify for a business hiring a handful of roles a year, where Workable, Homerun or Teamtailor are simpler. Against Greenhouse, Ashby offers stronger built-in analytics and scheduling, while Greenhouse has the larger integration marketplace and a longer enterprise track record. Lever is the other common comparison, with similar ATS plus CRM scope but slower recent innovation.
Greenhouse
Greenhouse is an applicant tracking system (ATS) and hiring platform founded in 2012 in New York by Daniel Chait and Jon Stross. Its philosophy is structured hiring: define the skills a role needs before interviewing, assign each interviewer specific attributes to assess, and use scorecards so decisions are based on consistent evidence rather than gut feeling. That approach made it the standard ATS for many venture-backed technology companies, and private equity firm TPG became its majority investor in 2021.
The platform covers job approvals, posting to job boards and a careers page, sourcing and referrals, interview kits and scorecards, automated scheduling, offer management and reporting, including diversity and inclusion features such as anonymized take-home tests. Greenhouse Onboarding extends the process after the offer is signed, and a marketplace of several hundred integrations connects background checks, assessments, sourcing tools and HRIS systems such as Workday and BambooHR. Plans (Core, Plus and Pro) are quote-based and scale with company size and modules.
Greenhouse fits mid-market and enterprise organizations hiring continuously across multiple teams, where interview consistency, compliance and integrations matter more than price. Small companies hiring a few people a year will find it expensive and heavy. Ashby is the main modern challenger, with stronger built-in analytics and scheduling in one product; Lever combines ATS and CRM for sourcing-heavy teams; and Workable or Homerun are simpler and cheaper options for small businesses.