Context Engine vs Toggl Track
Context Engine and Toggl Track are both personal productivity tools. Context Engine is aimed at small businesses and developers, while Toggl Track is aimed at freelancers and agencies. Both have a free plan.
Shared memory that AI agents and team members read and write
Simple time tracking and reporting
| Pricing | Freemium · $12 | Freemium · $12 |
| Starting price | $12/mo | $12/mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Free trial | — | 30 days |
| Built for | Small businesses, Developers, Agencies | Freelancers, Agencies |
| Platforms | web | web, macos, windows, ios, android |
| Country | US | EE · 2006 |
| Rating | — | — |
Choose Context Engine if
Small teams and agencies that use several AI assistants and want one shared, auditable memory across them.
- Unlimited human users on every plan, including free
- Low entry price of $12 a month per engine
- Works with ChatGPT, Claude, Claude Code and Cursor
Look elsewhere if: Developers who want an embeddable memory library inside their own agent code (Mem0, Zep).
Choose Toggl Track if
Freelancers and agencies tracking billable time.
- Very easy to use
- Free for small teams
- Great integrations
Look elsewhere if: Employee monitoring (not its purpose).
Context Engine vs Toggl Track pricing
Context Engine
- Free$01 agent (up to 3 via referrals) and 1 GB per engine, unlimited users
- Pro$12/moPer engine: 10 agents, 25 GB; $99/yr billed annually
- Unlimited$39/moPer engine: unlimited agents, 100 GB; $299/yr annually
- EnterpriseFrom $6,000/yrSelf-hosted install, SSO, roles and audit log
Toggl Track
- Free$0Free for a limited number of users
- Starter$12/user/mo$9/user/mo billed annually; billable rates
- Premium$24/user/mo$16/user/mo billed annually; approvals, forecasts
- EnterpriseCustomSSO, custom roles, dedicated support
Context Engine · Key features
- Shared memory that AI tools read and save to over MCP
- Separate engines, each with its own database and search index
- Per-connection access set to read only or read and save
- Plain-language answers that cite their source memories
- Automatic daily, weekly and monthly summaries
- Duplicate detection that updates the existing memory
Cons
- Free plan allows one agent per engine, three at most through referrals
- Each connected tool counts as a separate agent
- Self-hosting only on the Enterprise plan from $6,000 a year
Toggl Track · Key features
- One-click timers and manual entries
- Browser extension in 100+ tools
- Projects, clients, tags
- Billable rates and budgets
- Reports and timesheet approvals
- Cross-platform apps
Cons
- Advanced features on Premium
- No invoicing built in
- Per-user pricing
Context Engine vs Toggl Track: FAQ
Do Context Engine and Toggl Track have a free plan?
Yes, both Context Engine and Toggl Track have a free plan; paid plans add more usage and features.
Which is better for small businesses, Context Engine or Toggl Track?
Context Engine lists small businesses as a core audience, while Toggl Track is aimed more at freelancers and agencies.