Inyon vs RunInfra
Inyon and RunInfra are both developer tools tools aimed at developers and freelancers. Only Inyon has a free plan.
Open-source phone and browser remote for terminal coding agents
Open-model API with flat monthly plans for coding agents
| Pricing | Open source | Paid · $10 |
| Starting price | Not published | $10/mo |
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Built for | Developers, Freelancers | Developers, Freelancers, Small businesses, Enterprise |
| Platforms | web, android, macos, linux, windows | web |
| Country | — | — · 2025 |
| Rating | — | — |
Choose Inyon if
Developers who run Claude Code, Codex or other terminal agents for long stretches and want to steer them from an Android phone or browser.
- Free and MIT-licensed with code on GitHub
- Works across six agent CLIs, not just one vendor
- No account or cloud service required
Look elsewhere if: Developers who want a polished commercial iOS app or do not use tmux (Claude Code remote access).
Choose RunInfra if
Developers who use coding agents heavily and want open models at a flat, predictable monthly price.
- Predictable monthly cost from $10 for agent-heavy coding
- Drop-in for tools that already speak the OpenAI or Anthropic API
- Very low per-token prices on small and fast open models
Look elsewhere if: Teams that need the strongest closed models for complex coding work (Claude, ChatGPT Codex).
Inyon vs RunInfra pricing
Inyon
- Open source$0MIT license; self-hosted, no account needed
RunInfra
- Pay as you go$5Minimum prepaid top-up; $1 free credit; per-token pricing
- Starter$10/moAbout $12 of usage; limits reset every 5 hours and weekly
- Pro$29/moAbout $35 of usage, higher 5-hour and weekly limits
- Team$99/moAbout $119 of usage, shared by the workspace
- EnterpriseCustomDedicated capacity, RBAC, audit logs, SLA up to 99.99%
Inyon · Key features
- Agents running in tmux become phone or browser chats
- Permission prompts and menus turned into tap buttons
- Model, effort and permission mode changes plus rewind and compact
- Context, cost and 5-hour and weekly plan limit tracking
- File and git tree browsing, diff comments, commit and push
- Live subagent and background shell output with a Stop control
Cons
- No iOS app; iPhone users need the browser hub
- Depends on agents running inside tmux
- Three of six agent readers still in beta
RunInfra · Key features
- OpenAI- and Anthropic-compatible endpoints behind a single API key
- Open models including GLM 5.3, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Qwen3.8 27B
- One-prompt setup for Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, Cline and Droid
- Session-aware routing that keeps agent context cached between calls
- Flat coding plans with 5-hour and weekly usage windows
- Free Standby chat tier when plan limits run out
Cons
- Open models still trail top closed models on hard coding tasks
- Small catalog of eight models
- Starter limits are tight at about $1.11 of usage per 5 hours
Inyon vs RunInfra: FAQ
Do Inyon and RunInfra have a free plan?
Inyon has a free plan. RunInfra has no free plan.
Which is better for small businesses, Inyon or RunInfra?
RunInfra lists small businesses as a core audience, while Inyon is aimed more at developers and freelancers.