Formbricks vs Frill
Formbricks and Frill are both Customer feedback & roadmaps tools. Here is how they compare on pricing, audience, platforms and community votes.
Open-source in-app surveys
Lightweight ideas board and announcements
| Pricing | Open source · $74 | Paid · $25 |
| Built for | Developers, Small businesses | Freelancers, Small businesses |
| Platforms | web | web |
| Country | DE · 2022 | GB · 2020 |
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
| Rating | — | — |
Formbricks
Formbricks is an open-source survey and experience management platform from a Germany-based team, positioned as a privacy-friendly alternative to Qualtrics and Typeform for product feedback. Its focus is in-app and website surveys that appear to the right users at the right moment, plus classic link surveys, available either as a managed cloud or self-hosted on your own infrastructure.
Developers install a JavaScript, React Native or mobile SDK, then product teams define who sees a survey using user attributes, actions and page events, with controls for display frequency and recontact. Question types cover NPS, CSAT, ratings, open text, multiple choice, matrices and file uploads, with logic and hidden fields. Responses flow to a dashboard with filters and summaries and can be sent to Slack, Notion, Airtable, webhooks or Zapier. The community edition is free to self-host; cloud plans add response volume, team features and enterprise options such as SSO.
Formbricks fits product and UX teams that need targeted in-app feedback and care about data residency, including European companies working under GDPR. It is younger than its commercial rivals, the template library and analytics are lighter, and self-hosting means maintaining updates and a database. Typeform is stronger for polished marketing forms and quizzes, Sprig and Hotjar Surveys offer hosted in-app research, and Qualtrics remains the enterprise standard for large experience programs.
Frill
Frill is a customer feedback tool that combines three things product teams often buy separately: an ideas board where users submit and vote on requests, a public roadmap that shows what is planned and in progress, and an announcements feed for release notes. All three live on a hosted portal and inside an embeddable widget, so customers can give feedback and read updates without leaving the product.
Teams can merge duplicate ideas, set statuses, tag and prioritize requests, automatically notify voters when an idea ships, and on the relevant plans use a custom domain, white-labeling, SSO and integrations with tools such as Slack, Jira and Zapier. Pricing is a flat monthly fee rather than per tracked user: the Startup plan caps the number of active ideas, Business removes that limit, and Growth adds advanced controls such as privacy options and extra customization for larger teams.
Frill fits small and mid-sized SaaS teams that want a polished, easy-to-launch feedback loop at a predictable price. It is lighter than Productboard or Aha!, which connect feedback to full product planning, and Canny offers more integrations and analytics for larger teams at a higher cost. Featurebase and Nolt are other affordable options; Frill's edge is its design quality and the way a single widget packs ideas, roadmap and announcements together.