Happy Valley

Exa vs RunInfra

Exa and RunInfra are both AI assistants tools. Exa is aimed at developers and enterprise, while RunInfra is aimed at developers and freelancers. Only Exa has a free plan.

Exa

Web search and content API built for AI agents and LLM apps

RunInfra

Open-model API with flat monthly plans for coding agents

PricingFreemiumPaid · $10
Starting priceNot published$10/mo
Free planYesNo
Free trial——
Built forDevelopers, Enterprise, Small businessesDevelopers, Freelancers, Small businesses, Enterprise
Platformswebweb
CountryUS · 2021— · 2025
Rating——

Choose Exa if

Developers and AI teams who need a fast, controllable web search and content layer for agents, RAG or research products.

  • Free $10 monthly credit grant with no card required
  • Lite search at $4 per 1,000 requests suits high-volume agents
  • Highlights cut token usage and LLM costs compared with full pages

Look elsewhere if: Non-technical users who want a finished answer engine or chat app rather than an API (Perplexity, You.com).

Choose RunInfra if

Developers who use coding agents heavily and want open models at a flat, predictable monthly price.

  • Predictable monthly cost from $10 for agent-heavy coding
  • Drop-in for tools that already speak the OpenAI or Anthropic API
  • Very low per-token prices on small and fast open models

Look elsewhere if: Teams that need the strongest closed models for complex coding work (Claude, ChatGPT Codex).

Exa vs RunInfra pricing

Exa

  • Free$0$10 in credits every month plus a one-time $10 onboarding bonus
  • Search Lite$4/1,000 requestsUp to 10 results per request; $1 per 1k extra results
  • Search Auto$7/1,000 requestsUp to 10 results per request; AI summaries $1 per 1k pages
  • Deep Search$12/1,000 requestsdeep-lite (about 4 seconds) and deep (4 to 15 seconds) types
  • Contents$1/1,000 pagesPer content type; prepaid credits, no subscription or minimum

RunInfra

  • Pay as you go$5Minimum prepaid top-up; $1 free credit; per-token pricing
  • Starter$10/moAbout $12 of usage; limits reset every 5 hours and weekly
  • Pro$29/moAbout $35 of usage, higher 5-hour and weekly limits
  • Team$99/moAbout $119 of usage, shared by the workspace
  • EnterpriseCustomDedicated capacity, RBAC, audit logs, SLA up to 99.99%

Exa · Key features

  • Search API with lite, auto, deep-lite and deep types on one independent index
  • Dynamic Highlights that pass only the most relevant tokens to the model
  • Contents API for full page text, highlights and AI summaries
  • Agent API for cited research, list building and enrichment with structured output
  • Coverage of people, companies, code, papers, ecommerce listings and local businesses
  • Monitors for recurring searches and Websets for verified datasets

Cons

  • No flat monthly plan, so spend rises directly with traffic
  • Websets API needs a separate paid Websets plan and credits
  • Benchmark leadership is reported by Exa itself

RunInfra · Key features

  • OpenAI- and Anthropic-compatible endpoints behind a single API key
  • Open models including GLM 5.3, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Qwen3.8 27B
  • One-prompt setup for Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, Cline and Droid
  • Session-aware routing that keeps agent context cached between calls
  • Flat coding plans with 5-hour and weekly usage windows
  • Free Standby chat tier when plan limits run out

Cons

  • Open models still trail top closed models on hard coding tasks
  • Small catalog of eight models
  • Starter limits are tight at about $1.11 of usage per 5 hours

Exa vs RunInfra: FAQ

Do Exa and RunInfra have a free plan?

Exa has a free plan. RunInfra has no free plan.

Not sure yet?