Display vs Logseq
Display and Logseq are both note-taking & docs tools. Display is aimed at developers and small businesses, while Logseq is aimed at developers and creators. Both have a free plan.
Shared workspace where AI agents publish docs, prototypes and apps
Open-source outliner with bi-directional links
| Pricing | Freemium · $12 | Open source |
| Starting price | $12/mo | Not published |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Built for | Developers, Small businesses, Enterprise, Freelancers | Developers, Creators |
| Platforms | web | macos, windows, linux, ios, android |
| Country | EE | US · 2020 |
| Rating | — | — |
Choose Display if
Product and engineering teams that already generate HTML docs and prototypes with coding agents and want one private place to share, review and version them.
- Works with any agent, so Claude and Codex users can edit the same doc
- Unlimited free viewers and commenters on every plan
- Flat Team price covers up to 150 editors
Look elsewhere if: Teams that mainly need a classic wiki or office-file storage with mature compliance paperwork (Confluence, Google Drive).
Choose Logseq if
Outliner fans and researchers.
- Free and open source
- Local files
- Great for journaling
Look elsewhere if: Team wikis.
Display vs Logseq pricing
Display
- Free$01 editor, 3 gated docs, 50 MB, unlimited viewers
- Solo$12/mo1 editor, 5 GB, version history; $9/mo billed yearly
- Team$79/moUp to 150 editors, 100 GB, Shared Spaces; $59/mo yearly
- Business$265/mo1 TB, 365-day audit logs, sharing controls; $199/mo yearly
- EnterpriseCustom150+ editors, SAML SSO, signed DPA, SLA, custom storage
Logseq
- Free$0Open-source (AGPL) desktop and web apps
- Backer$5/moOpen Collective; insider builds, DB beta and sync
- Sponsor$15/moOpen Collective; insider builds, sync access
Display · Key features
- Publish agent-made HTML and Markdown docs to stable private URLs
- MCP server, CLI and Claude connector for agents such as Codex and Cursor
- Version on every publish, with restore on Solo and higher plans
- Line-level comments that agents can read and resolve
- In-browser editing for people with edit access
- Spaces and folders for docs, images, PDFs and data files
Cons
- No SOC 2 report yet, per the vendor's security page
- SAML single sign-on only on the custom Enterprise plan
- Version history and folders require at least the paid Solo plan
Logseq · Key features
- Outliner with blocks
- Bidirectional links
- Daily journals
- Queries
- Whiteboards
- Plugins
Cons
- Sync limited
- Learning curve
- Mobile weaker
Display vs Logseq: FAQ
Do Display and Logseq have a free plan?
Yes, both Display and Logseq have a free plan; paid plans add more usage and features.
Which is better for small businesses, Display or Logseq?
Display lists small businesses as a core audience, while Logseq is aimed more at developers and creators.