Cursor vs Inyon
Cursor and Inyon are both developer tools tools. Cursor is aimed at developers and small businesses, while Inyon is aimed at developers and freelancers. Both have a free plan.
AI-first code editor with agents, now owned by SpaceX
Open-source phone and browser remote for terminal coding agents
| Pricing | Freemium · $8 | Open source |
| Starting price | $8/mo | Not published |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Built for | Developers, Small businesses, Enterprise, Freelancers | Developers, Freelancers |
| Platforms | macos, windows, linux, web | web, android, macos, linux, windows |
| Country | US · 2022 | — |
| Rating | — | — |
Choose Cursor if
Professional developers and engineering teams who want an AI agent built into the editor rather than bolted on.
- Agent workflow is among the most mature in any code editor
- Familiar VS Code interface with near-zero migration effort
- Fast, accurate Tab completion that many developers rate above rivals
Look elsewhere if: Developers who want Tab completion inside JetBrains or Vim, or teams that need predictable flat pricing for Claude and GPT models (GitHub Copilot, Claude Code).
Choose Inyon if
Developers who run Claude Code, Codex or other terminal agents for long stretches and want to steer them from an Android phone or browser.
- Free and MIT-licensed with code on GitHub
- Works across six agent CLIs, not just one vendor
- No account or cloud service required
Look elsewhere if: Developers who want a polished commercial iOS app or do not use tmux (Claude Code remote access).
Cursor vs Inyon pricing
Cursor
- Free$0Limited agent and chat requests
- Plus$8/moShared Grok, Cursor and X pool; Grok models only
- Premium$30/mo4x Plus usage, cloud agents, Bugbot code reviews
- Super$100/mo15x Plus usage, priority model access at peak times
- Ultra$200/mo50x Plus usage, earliest access to new models
Inyon
- Open source$0MIT license; self-hosted, no account needed
Cursor · Key features
- Tab autocomplete that predicts multi-line edits and the next cursor jump
- Agent mode that edits many files and runs terminal commands
- Cloud agents that work on tasks in parallel in remote sandboxes
- Bugbot automated code review on GitHub pull requests
- Codebase indexing so chat and agents understand the whole repo
- Project Rules, skills and MCP servers to shape agent behavior
Cons
- Third-party models such as Claude and GPT cost extra at API prices
- Plus plan only offers Grok models
- Pricing has changed repeatedly, including a 2025 backlash over Pro limits
Inyon · Key features
- Agents running in tmux become phone or browser chats
- Permission prompts and menus turned into tap buttons
- Model, effort and permission mode changes plus rewind and compact
- Context, cost and 5-hour and weekly plan limit tracking
- File and git tree browsing, diff comments, commit and push
- Live subagent and background shell output with a Stop control
Cons
- No iOS app; iPhone users need the browser hub
- Depends on agents running inside tmux
- Three of six agent readers still in beta
Cursor vs Inyon: FAQ
Do Cursor and Inyon have a free plan?
Yes, both Cursor and Inyon have a free plan; paid plans add more usage and features.
Which is better for small businesses, Cursor or Inyon?
Cursor lists small businesses as a core audience, while Inyon is aimed more at developers and freelancers.