beacon.sh vs Uptime Kuma
beacon.sh and Uptime Kuma are both uptime & monitoring tools. beacon.sh is aimed at developers and enterprise, while Uptime Kuma is aimed at developers. Both have a free plan.
Open-source memory layer that carries lessons across coding agents
Self-hosted uptime monitoring
| Pricing | Open source | Open source |
| Starting price | Not published | Not published |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Built for | Developers, Enterprise, Small businesses | Developers |
| Platforms | macos, windows, linux, web | web |
| Country | US | HK · 2021 |
| Rating | — | — |
Choose beacon.sh if
Developers and engineering teams using several AI coding agents who want shared, reviewed memory and a full record of agent activity.
- MIT-licensed core that runs locally without lock-in to one harness
- One timeline for every agent and machine, including token spend
- Turns repeated walkthroughs into skills every agent can reuse
Look elsewhere if: Teams that only need a shared knowledge store for agents and people, or want to train their own models from traces (Context Engine, Overmind).
Choose Uptime Kuma if
Developers and small teams comfortable self-hosting who want free, reliable uptime checks.
- Free and open source
- Very easy to deploy
- Huge range of notifications
Look elsewhere if: Teams needing on-call rotations, SLAs and multi-user management.
beacon.sh vs Uptime Kuma pricing
beacon.sh
- Open source$0MIT-licensed local endpoint, JSONL traces, local dashboard
- Beacon Cloud$020+ agents, 50 findings, session search over MCP, daily digest
- Cloud Pro$20/moBilled annually (save 25%); unlimited findings, memories over MCP
- Cloud Team$30/seat/moBilled annually plus $10/mo base, up to 20 seats, shared traces
- EnterpriseCustomApproval gates, SSO, RBAC, audit logs, your own bucket and region
Uptime Kuma
- Open source$0MIT license, self-hosted via Docker or Node
beacon.sh · Key features
- Session capture across Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, OpenCode and 20+ other harnesses
- OpenTelemetry-based event model stored as local JSONL by default
- Reviewed memories and skills served to agents over MCP and Agent Skills
- Cloud findings with one-click skills, fix prompts and an evidence trail
- Full session replay with prompts, commands, edits, approvals and tokens
- Terminal trace browser and read-only local dashboard
Cons
- Pro and Team prices are shown only with annual billing
- Team price is listed as $30 per seat in one place and $40 in the comparison table
- Free cloud tier caps findings at 50
Uptime Kuma · Key features
- HTTP, TCP, ping, DNS, keyword, JSON and Docker monitors
- Push monitors for cron and heartbeat checks
- 90+ notification providers including Slack, Telegram, Discord
- Status pages with custom domains
- Certificate expiry monitoring
- Single-container Docker deployment
Cons
- Self-hosted only; you monitor the monitor
- Single-user by default
- Basic incident management
beacon.sh vs Uptime Kuma: FAQ
Do beacon.sh and Uptime Kuma have a free plan?
Yes, both beacon.sh and Uptime Kuma have a free plan; paid plans add more usage and features.
Which is better for small businesses, beacon.sh or Uptime Kuma?
beacon.sh lists small businesses as a core audience, while Uptime Kuma is aimed more at developers.