Apidog vs Inyon
Apidog and Inyon are both developer tools tools. Apidog is aimed at developers and small businesses, while Inyon is aimed at developers and freelancers. Both have a free plan.
All-in-one API design, testing, mocking and docs; a Postman rival
Open-source phone and browser remote for terminal coding agents
| Pricing | Freemium · $12 | Open source |
| Starting price | $12/mo | Not published |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Free trial | 14 days | — |
| Built for | Developers, Small businesses, Enterprise | Developers, Freelancers |
| Platforms | web, macos, windows, linux | web, android, macos, linux, windows |
| Country | — | — |
| Rating | — | — |
Choose Apidog if
Small and mid-size engineering teams that want one spec-first tool for API design, debugging, testing, mocking and docs at a lower per-seat cost than Postman.
- Replaces several tools with one spec-first workspace
- Free for up to four users; paid seats cost less than Postman
- Imports Postman, Insomnia, OpenAPI, HAR, cURL and WSDL
Look elsewhere if: Companies whose main need is a polished public developer portal or strict design governance (ReadMe, Mintlify, Stoplight).
Choose Inyon if
Developers who run Claude Code, Codex or other terminal agents for long stretches and want to steer them from an Android phone or browser.
- Free and MIT-licensed with code on GitHub
- Works across six agent CLIs, not just one vendor
- No account or cloud service required
Look elsewhere if: Developers who want a polished commercial iOS app or do not use tmux (Claude Code remote access).
Apidog vs Inyon pricing
Apidog
- Free$0Up to 4 users; design, debug, test, mock and docs
- Basic$12/user/mo$9/user/mo billed annually; 3 custom domains
- Professional$24/user/mo$18/user/mo billed annually; unlimited change history
- Enterprise$27/user/moBilled annually; SSO, organizations; on-prem separately
Inyon
- Open source$0MIT license; self-hosted, no account needed
Apidog · Key features
- Visual OpenAPI and JSON Schema designer with change history
- Request client for HTTP, GraphQL, gRPC, WebSocket, SOAP and SSE
- Postman-compatible pre and post scripts and database connections
- Visual test scenarios, scheduled runs and performance testing
- Schema-driven smart mocks, cloud mock and self-hosted runner mock
- Interactive API docs with custom domains and free readers
Cons
- Interface is dense and takes time for non-technical users
- Public docs portals are less polished than ReadMe or Mintlify
- Smaller community and plugin ecosystem than Postman
Inyon · Key features
- Agents running in tmux become phone or browser chats
- Permission prompts and menus turned into tap buttons
- Model, effort and permission mode changes plus rewind and compact
- Context, cost and 5-hour and weekly plan limit tracking
- File and git tree browsing, diff comments, commit and push
- Live subagent and background shell output with a Stop control
Cons
- No iOS app; iPhone users need the browser hub
- Depends on agents running inside tmux
- Three of six agent readers still in beta
Apidog vs Inyon: FAQ
Do Apidog and Inyon have a free plan?
Yes, both Apidog and Inyon have a free plan; paid plans add more usage and features.
Which is better for small businesses, Apidog or Inyon?
Apidog lists small businesses as a core audience, while Inyon is aimed more at developers and freelancers.