Happy Valley

Activepieces vs Make

Activepieces and Make are both Workflow automation tools. Here is how they compare on pricing, audience, platforms and community votes.

Activepieces

Open-source business automation

Make

Visual automation with branching scenarios

PricingOpen source · $20Freemium
Built forSmall businesses, DevelopersSmall businesses, Agencies
Platformswebweb
CountryUS · 2022CZ · 2012
Community votes00
Rating——

Activepieces

Activepieces is an open-source automation platform, with its community edition released under the MIT license, that positions itself as a friendlier and more predictable alternative to Zapier and Make. Built by a Y Combinator-backed startup, it lets operations, marketing and product teams connect apps and automate repetitive work through a visual flow builder, while developers extend it with TypeScript 'pieces' that become reusable integrations.

Flows support branches, loops, code steps, approval steps that wait for a human, and AI steps that call language models or run agents. The catalog covers 280+ pieces, and those pieces are also exposed as MCP tools so AI agents can act on connected apps. You can self-host the community edition for free with Docker, use credit-based cloud plans that range from a free tier to Plus and Team, or license an embed edition that puts white-labeled automation inside your own SaaS product.

Activepieces fits startups and mid-size teams that want automation with predictable costs, and SaaS companies that want an embeddable integration layer. Its catalog is far smaller than Zapier's thousands of apps, so niche integrations may need a custom piece or an HTTP step. n8n offers more raw power and a larger self-hosted community but a steeper learning curve and a fair-code license; Make is inexpensive in the cloud but proprietary; Zapier remains the easiest choice when breadth of integrations is the only priority.

Make

Make, formerly Integromat, is a visual automation platform founded in Prague in the Czech Republic. Celonis acquired Integromat in 2020 and relaunched it as Make in 2022. Its core job is connecting apps and automating multi-step processes, with a visual canvas that handles complex logic better than linear automation tools.

Scenarios are built as flowcharts: modules for each app action are connected by routes, with routers for branching, iterators and aggregators for working with lists, filters, data transformation functions and error handlers for retries and fallbacks. Make supports more than 2,000 apps plus generic HTTP, webhooks and JSON tools for anything with an API, along with AI modules for OpenAI, Anthropic Claude and other providers. Make AI Agents, introduced in 2025, add goal-driven agents that decide which tools to use. Since August 2025 pricing is based on credits instead of operations: most module runs use one credit, AI modules can use more. Plans from the free tier up to Enterprise add more credits, shorter scheduling intervals, team roles and security features.

Make fits operations teams, agencies and technical marketers who build complex, high-volume automations and want them to cost less than on Zapier. The visual approach has a steeper learning curve, and credit consumption needs monitoring as scenarios grow, especially with AI modules. Zapier is easier for simple automations and has more app integrations, n8n is open source and self-hostable for developers, and Power Automate suits Microsoft-centric organizations.

Activepieces vs Make (2026): Pricing and Features