PulseDev vs RunInfra
PulseDev and RunInfra are both AI assistants tools aimed at developers and freelancers. RunInfra costs less, from $10/mo versus $18/mo for PulseDev. Only PulseDev has a free plan.
Click a UI bug on localhost and your AI coding agent fixes it
Open-model API with flat monthly plans for coding agents
| Pricing | Freemium · $18 | Paid · $10 |
| Starting price | $18/mo | $10/mo |
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Free trial | 5 days | — |
| Built for | Developers, Freelancers | Developers, Freelancers, Small businesses, Enterprise |
| Platforms | macos | web |
| Country | GB | — · 2025 |
| Rating | — | — |
Choose PulseDev if
Front-end developers on macOS who already use Claude Code, Codex or Gemini CLI and want faster UI fixes.
- Uses the agent you already pay for instead of a new one
- Nothing is written until you approve the diff
- Fully local with no account or cloud server
Look elsewhere if: Windows or Linux users and teams wanting an all-in-one AI editor (Cursor).
Choose RunInfra if
Developers who use coding agents heavily and want open models at a flat, predictable monthly price.
- Predictable monthly cost from $10 for agent-heavy coding
- Drop-in for tools that already speak the OpenAI or Anthropic API
- Very low per-token prices on small and fast open models
Look elsewhere if: Teams that need the strongest closed models for complex coding work (Claude, ChatGPT Codex).
PulseDev vs RunInfra pricing
PulseDev
- Free$01 project, 1 agent, unlimited runs and diff review
- Pro$18/moUnlimited projects, all agents; 33% off yearly, launch price $12
- Founder Lifetime$149/one-timeSingle user, first 200 buyers
RunInfra
- Pay as you go$5Minimum prepaid top-up; $1 free credit; per-token pricing
- Starter$10/moAbout $12 of usage; limits reset every 5 hours and weekly
- Pro$29/moAbout $35 of usage, higher 5-hour and weekly limits
- Team$99/moAbout $119 of usage, shared by the workspace
- EnterpriseCustomDedicated capacity, RBAC, audit logs, SLA up to 99.99%
PulseDev · Key features
- Click-to-select elements on localhost with selector and styles captured
- Plain-language change requests sent to your own coding agent
- In-browser diff review with approve, reject or reply
- Live log of every read, edit and command the agent runs
- Task board with queued, running, in-review and done states
- Screenshot, console error and network error capture
Cons
- macOS only, Windows not yet available
- Pre-1.0 software from a single maker
- Requires a separately paid coding agent
RunInfra · Key features
- OpenAI- and Anthropic-compatible endpoints behind a single API key
- Open models including GLM 5.3, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Qwen3.8 27B
- One-prompt setup for Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, Cline and Droid
- Session-aware routing that keeps agent context cached between calls
- Flat coding plans with 5-hour and weekly usage windows
- Free Standby chat tier when plan limits run out
Cons
- Open models still trail top closed models on hard coding tasks
- Small catalog of eight models
- Starter limits are tight at about $1.11 of usage per 5 hours
PulseDev vs RunInfra: FAQ
Which is cheaper, PulseDev or RunInfra?
RunInfra starts at $10/mo and PulseDev at $18/mo. Both prices are checked on the vendors' own pricing pages.
Do PulseDev and RunInfra have a free plan?
PulseDev has a free plan. RunInfra has no free plan.
Which is better for small businesses, PulseDev or RunInfra?
RunInfra lists small businesses as a core audience, while PulseDev is aimed more at developers and freelancers.