OpenLLM vs RunInfra
OpenLLM and RunInfra are both AI assistants tools aimed at developers and freelancers. RunInfra costs less, from $10/mo versus $30/mo for OpenLLM. Only OpenLLM has a free plan.
Routes coding agents through your AI plans, API keys and local models
Open-model API with flat monthly plans for coding agents
| Pricing | Freemium · $30 | Paid · $10 |
| Starting price | $30/mo | $10/mo |
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Free trial | 3 days | — |
| Built for | Developers, Freelancers | Developers, Freelancers, Small businesses, Enterprise |
| Platforms | macos, linux | web |
| Country | — | — · 2025 |
| Rating | — | — |
Choose OpenLLM if
Individual developers who pay for several AI plans and want every coding agent to use them through one endpoint with automatic fallback.
- Free tier is generous at 50M non-cached tokens a month
- Existing config such as ~/.claude is left unmodified
- Keeps agents running through rate limits with fallback chains
Look elsewhere if: Teams that need a self-hosted, governed gateway or pay-per-token access to many models without accounts (LiteLLM, OpenRouter).
Choose RunInfra if
Developers who use coding agents heavily and want open models at a flat, predictable monthly price.
- Predictable monthly cost from $10 for agent-heavy coding
- Drop-in for tools that already speak the OpenAI or Anthropic API
- Very low per-token prices on small and fast open models
Look elsewhere if: Teams that need the strongest closed models for complex coding work (Claude, ChatGPT Codex).
OpenLLM vs RunInfra pricing
OpenLLM
- Free$050M non-cached tokens/mo included, 2 devices, no card
- Pro$30/moUnlimited tokens, 5 devices, hosted gateway; 3-day trial
RunInfra
- Pay as you go$5Minimum prepaid top-up; $1 free credit; per-token pricing
- Starter$10/moAbout $12 of usage; limits reset every 5 hours and weekly
- Pro$29/moAbout $35 of usage, higher 5-hour and weekly limits
- Team$99/moAbout $119 of usage, shared by the workspace
- EnterpriseCustomDedicated capacity, RBAC, audit logs, SLA up to 99.99%
OpenLLM · Key features
- One OpenAI- and Anthropic-compatible endpoint and key for every connected model
- Use Claude, ChatGPT, Kimi Code and Grok subscriptions from other agents
- Fallback model chains when a model is rate-limited or unavailable
- Auto-detection of local Ollama and LM Studio model servers
- Shared MCP memory across Claude Code, Codex, Grok Build and OpenCode
- Browser-side AES-256-GCM key vault with a user-held recovery phrase
Cons
- No Windows support for the local daemon
- Single-user today, with no team features
- Losing the recovery phrase means re-entering every key
RunInfra · Key features
- OpenAI- and Anthropic-compatible endpoints behind a single API key
- Open models including GLM 5.3, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Qwen3.8 27B
- One-prompt setup for Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, Cline and Droid
- Session-aware routing that keeps agent context cached between calls
- Flat coding plans with 5-hour and weekly usage windows
- Free Standby chat tier when plan limits run out
Cons
- Open models still trail top closed models on hard coding tasks
- Small catalog of eight models
- Starter limits are tight at about $1.11 of usage per 5 hours
OpenLLM vs RunInfra: FAQ
Which is cheaper, OpenLLM or RunInfra?
RunInfra starts at $10/mo and OpenLLM at $30/mo. Both prices are checked on the vendors' own pricing pages.
Do OpenLLM and RunInfra have a free plan?
OpenLLM has a free plan. RunInfra has no free plan.
Which is better for small businesses, OpenLLM or RunInfra?
RunInfra lists small businesses as a core audience, while OpenLLM is aimed more at developers and freelancers.