Cursor vs Whiteboard
Cursor and Whiteboard are both developer tools tools. Cursor is aimed at developers and small businesses, while Whiteboard is aimed at developers and enterprise. Both have a free plan.
AI-first code editor with agents, now owned by SpaceX
Open-source desktop canvas for reviewing coding agent work
| Pricing | Freemium · $8 | Open source |
| Starting price | $8/mo | Not published |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Built for | Developers, Small businesses, Enterprise, Freelancers | Developers, Enterprise, Small businesses |
| Platforms | macos, windows, linux, web | macos, windows, linux |
| Country | US · 2022 | — |
| Rating | — | — |
Choose Cursor if
Professional developers and engineering teams who want an AI agent built into the editor rather than bolted on.
- Agent workflow is among the most mature in any code editor
- Familiar VS Code interface with near-zero migration effort
- Fast, accurate Tab completion that many developers rate above rivals
Look elsewhere if: Developers who want Tab completion inside JetBrains or Vim, or teams that need predictable flat pricing for Claude and GPT models (GitHub Copilot, Claude Code).
Choose Whiteboard if
Developers who let coding agents write large changes and want a visual, architecture-level way to review them.
- Free and MIT-licensed, runs against local checkouts
- Works with the coding agents teams already use
- Reviews structure and decisions, not only changed lines
Look elsewhere if: Teams that need an editor or a full review workflow with approvals and comments (GitHub, Cursor).
Cursor vs Whiteboard pricing
Cursor
- Free$0Limited agent and chat requests
- Plus$8/moShared Grok, Cursor and X pool; Grok models only
- Premium$30/mo4x Plus usage, cloud agents, Bugbot code reviews
- Super$100/mo15x Plus usage, priority model access at peak times
- Ultra$200/mo50x Plus usage, earliest access to new models
Whiteboard
- Open source$0MIT-licensed desktop app for macOS, Windows and Linux
Cursor · Key features
- Tab autocomplete that predicts multi-line edits and the next cursor jump
- Agent mode that edits many files and runs terminal commands
- Cloud agents that work on tasks in parallel in remote sandboxes
- Bugbot automated code review on GitHub pull requests
- Codebase indexing so chat and agents understand the whole repo
- Project Rules, skills and MCP servers to shape agent behavior
Cons
- Third-party models such as Claude and GPT cost extra at API prices
- Plus plan only offers Grok models
- Pricing has changed repeatedly, including a 2025 backlash over Pro limits
Whiteboard · Key features
- Agent-drawn sequence and entity relationship diagrams linked to code
- AST-aware semantic diff viewer written in Rust
- Pseudocode summaries of long functions and collapsed test changes
- Decision log of agent traces for auditing autonomous choices
- Code OSS base with VS Code keybindings and LSP support
- Automatic MCP setup for Claude Code, Codex, Cursor and OpenCode
Cons
- Beta software; files cannot be edited inside the app
- Reviews spanning several repositories are poorly supported
- Shared reviews do not update and must be re-shared
Cursor vs Whiteboard: FAQ
Do Cursor and Whiteboard have a free plan?
Yes, both Cursor and Whiteboard have a free plan; paid plans add more usage and features.