Auphonic vs Notta
Auphonic and Notta are both podcast & audio tools. Auphonic is aimed at creators, while Notta is aimed at small businesses and freelancers. Auphonic costs less, from $13/mo versus $13.99/mo for Notta. Both have a free plan.
| Pricing | Freemium · $13 | Freemium · $14 |
| Starting price | $13/mo | $13.99/mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Free trial | — | 7 days |
| Built for | Creators | Small businesses, Freelancers, Enterprise |
| Platforms | web | web, ios, android |
| Country | AT · 2012 | — · 2020 |
| Rating | — | — |
Choose Auphonic if
Podcasters and educators wanting consistent audio.
- Excellent automatic audio quality
- Affordable
- Free monthly hours
Look elsewhere if: Detailed manual audio editing.
Choose Notta if
Multilingual teams, researchers and journalists who need accurate transcripts and summaries in many languages.
- Strong multilingual support, including Asian languages
- Low annual price for Pro compared with Otter
- Works across meetings, browser, mobile and file uploads
Look elsewhere if: Sales teams wanting deep conversation analytics or English-only users happy with free tools (Fireflies, Gong, Otter.ai).
Auphonic vs Notta pricing
Auphonic
- Free$02 h/month, Auphonic jingle added, multitrack under 20 min
- Auphonic S$13/mo9 h/month; $11/mo billed yearly (save 20%)
- Auphonic M$30/mo21 h/month; $25/mo billed yearly
- Auphonic L$64/mo45 h/month; $52/mo billed yearly; XL 100 h $136, XXL 250 h $290
- One-time creditsfrom $125 h for $12, never expire; up to 3,000 h for $2,925
Notta
- Free$0120 min/mo, 3 min per recording, 10 AI summaries
- Pro$13.99/mo$8.17/mo billed annually ($97.99/yr); 1,800 min/mo
- Business$27.99/seat/mo$16.67 billed annually ($199.99/yr); unlimited minutes
- EnterpriseCustomFrom 51 seats; SAML SSO, audit logs, data controls
Auphonic · Key features
- Automatic leveling and loudness normalization
- Noise and hum reduction
- Multitrack balancing
- Transcription and chapters
- Publishing to hosts
- API for automation
Cons
- Not an editor
- Less control than manual mixing
- Upload-based workflow
Notta · Key features
- Transcription in 58 languages with speaker identification
- Meeting bot for Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams and Webex
- Audio and video file import for interviews and podcasts
- AI summaries with customizable templates
- Transcript translation, bilingual transcription and real-time translation
- Notta Brain for questions across all recordings
Cons
- Free plan caps recordings at 3 minutes
- Real-time and bilingual translation cost extra beyond a few uses
- Monthly-billing prices are much higher than annual ones
Auphonic vs Notta: FAQ
Which is cheaper, Auphonic or Notta?
Auphonic starts at $13/mo and Notta at $13.99/mo. Both prices are checked on the vendors' own pricing pages.
Do Auphonic and Notta have a free plan?
Yes, both Auphonic and Notta have a free plan; paid plans add more usage and features.
Which is better for small businesses, Auphonic or Notta?
Notta lists small businesses as a core audience, while Auphonic is aimed more at creators.