Happy Valley

Appsmith vs Cursor

Appsmith and Cursor are both Developer tools tools. Here is how they compare on pricing, audience, platforms and community votes.

Appsmith

Open-source internal tool builder

Cursor

AI-first code editor with agents, now owned by SpaceX

PricingOpen source · $15Freemium · $8
Built forDevelopersDevelopers, Small businesses, Enterprise, Freelancers
Platformswebmacos, windows, linux, web
CountryIN · 2019US · 2022
Community votes00
Rating——

Appsmith

Appsmith is an open-source low-code platform for building internal tools, created by a company with roots in Bangalore and San Francisco. Developers drag widgets such as tables, forms, charts and modals onto a canvas, connect them to databases and APIs, and write JavaScript anywhere for logic and data transformation. The result is admin panels, dashboards and approval apps built in hours instead of weeks.

The Community edition is open source and free to self-host with Docker or Kubernetes, which makes it attractive for teams with data residency or compliance requirements. The cloud Free plan suits small teams, while the per-user Business plan adds granular access control, Git-based version control with branching, workflows, audit logs and environments. Enterprise adds SSO, SCIM and dedicated support. Connectors cover Postgres, MySQL, MongoDB, REST, GraphQL, Google Sheets and many SaaS APIs, and AI features help generate queries and integrate LLMs into apps.

Appsmith is a strong fit for engineering teams that want Retool-style speed without vendor lock-in or per-seat costs that explode across large internal audiences. It has fewer components and a less polished UI than Retool, and self-hosting means you own upgrades and uptime. Budibase and ToolJet are the other open-source options; Retool remains the reference for polish and ecosystem.

Cursor

Cursor is an AI code editor built by Anysphere, a San Francisco company founded in 2022 by four MIT students: Michael Truell, Sualeh Asif, Arvid Lunnemark and Aman Sanger. It is a fork of VS Code, so extensions, themes and keybindings carry over, and its job is to let developers write, refactor and debug code with AI agents that understand the whole repository. SpaceX closed its $60 billion all-stock acquisition of Anysphere on August 14, 2026, and Cursor is being folded into SpaceXAI next to Grok.

The editor combines multi-line Tab completion that predicts your next edit, an Agent that plans changes across files and runs terminal commands, parallel cloud agents, Bugbot reviews on GitHub pull requests, project Rules and MCP servers. Since October 12, 2026 it is sold as part of The X Subscription, one plan shared with Grok and X Premium: a free tier, then Plus, Premium, Super and Ultra with a common usage pool, plus Teams and Enterprise plans.

Cursor fits professional developers who want an agent-centric IDE rather than a plug-in. Costs are harder to predict than before: third-party models such as Claude or GPT are now billed at API prices on the new plans, and JetBrains users get only the agent, through the ACP plugin. GitHub Copilot is cheaper and works in more IDEs, Claude Code suits terminal-first work, and ChatGPT's Codex covers similar agent tasks.

Buying tip: existing Cursor subscribers can stay on their old plans, and those who switch get a prorated refund. If your team relies on non-Grok models, estimate API spend before moving to the bundled tiers.