Apidog vs Whiteboard
Apidog and Whiteboard are both developer tools tools. Apidog is aimed at developers and small businesses, while Whiteboard is aimed at developers and enterprise. Both have a free plan.
All-in-one API design, testing, mocking and docs; a Postman rival
Open-source desktop canvas for reviewing coding agent work
| Pricing | Freemium · $12 | Open source |
| Starting price | $12/mo | Not published |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Free trial | 14 days | — |
| Built for | Developers, Small businesses, Enterprise | Developers, Enterprise, Small businesses |
| Platforms | web, macos, windows, linux | macos, windows, linux |
| Country | — | — |
| Rating | — | — |
Choose Apidog if
Small and mid-size engineering teams that want one spec-first tool for API design, debugging, testing, mocking and docs at a lower per-seat cost than Postman.
- Replaces several tools with one spec-first workspace
- Free for up to four users; paid seats cost less than Postman
- Imports Postman, Insomnia, OpenAPI, HAR, cURL and WSDL
Look elsewhere if: Companies whose main need is a polished public developer portal or strict design governance (ReadMe, Mintlify, Stoplight).
Choose Whiteboard if
Developers who let coding agents write large changes and want a visual, architecture-level way to review them.
- Free and MIT-licensed, runs against local checkouts
- Works with the coding agents teams already use
- Reviews structure and decisions, not only changed lines
Look elsewhere if: Teams that need an editor or a full review workflow with approvals and comments (GitHub, Cursor).
Apidog vs Whiteboard pricing
Apidog
- Free$0Up to 4 users; design, debug, test, mock and docs
- Basic$12/user/mo$9/user/mo billed annually; 3 custom domains
- Professional$24/user/mo$18/user/mo billed annually; unlimited change history
- Enterprise$27/user/moBilled annually; SSO, organizations; on-prem separately
Whiteboard
- Open source$0MIT-licensed desktop app for macOS, Windows and Linux
Apidog · Key features
- Visual OpenAPI and JSON Schema designer with change history
- Request client for HTTP, GraphQL, gRPC, WebSocket, SOAP and SSE
- Postman-compatible pre and post scripts and database connections
- Visual test scenarios, scheduled runs and performance testing
- Schema-driven smart mocks, cloud mock and self-hosted runner mock
- Interactive API docs with custom domains and free readers
Cons
- Interface is dense and takes time for non-technical users
- Public docs portals are less polished than ReadMe or Mintlify
- Smaller community and plugin ecosystem than Postman
Whiteboard · Key features
- Agent-drawn sequence and entity relationship diagrams linked to code
- AST-aware semantic diff viewer written in Rust
- Pseudocode summaries of long functions and collapsed test changes
- Decision log of agent traces for auditing autonomous choices
- Code OSS base with VS Code keybindings and LSP support
- Automatic MCP setup for Claude Code, Codex, Cursor and OpenCode
Cons
- Beta software; files cannot be edited inside the app
- Reviews spanning several repositories are poorly supported
- Shared reviews do not update and must be re-shared
Apidog vs Whiteboard: FAQ
Do Apidog and Whiteboard have a free plan?
Yes, both Apidog and Whiteboard have a free plan; paid plans add more usage and features.