Apidog vs RunInfra
Apidog and RunInfra are both developer tools tools. Apidog is aimed at developers and small businesses, while RunInfra is aimed at developers and freelancers. RunInfra costs less, from $10/mo versus $12/mo for Apidog. Only Apidog has a free plan.
All-in-one API design, testing, mocking and docs; a Postman rival
Open-model API with flat monthly plans for coding agents
| Pricing | Freemium · $12 | Paid · $10 |
| Starting price | $12/mo | $10/mo |
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Free trial | 14 days | — |
| Built for | Developers, Small businesses, Enterprise | Developers, Freelancers, Small businesses, Enterprise |
| Platforms | web, macos, windows, linux | web |
| Country | — | — · 2025 |
| Rating | — | — |
Choose Apidog if
Small and mid-size engineering teams that want one spec-first tool for API design, debugging, testing, mocking and docs at a lower per-seat cost than Postman.
- Replaces several tools with one spec-first workspace
- Free for up to four users; paid seats cost less than Postman
- Imports Postman, Insomnia, OpenAPI, HAR, cURL and WSDL
Look elsewhere if: Companies whose main need is a polished public developer portal or strict design governance (ReadMe, Mintlify, Stoplight).
Choose RunInfra if
Developers who use coding agents heavily and want open models at a flat, predictable monthly price.
- Predictable monthly cost from $10 for agent-heavy coding
- Drop-in for tools that already speak the OpenAI or Anthropic API
- Very low per-token prices on small and fast open models
Look elsewhere if: Teams that need the strongest closed models for complex coding work (Claude, ChatGPT Codex).
Apidog vs RunInfra pricing
Apidog
- Free$0Up to 4 users; design, debug, test, mock and docs
- Basic$12/user/mo$9/user/mo billed annually; 3 custom domains
- Professional$24/user/mo$18/user/mo billed annually; unlimited change history
- Enterprise$27/user/moBilled annually; SSO, organizations; on-prem separately
RunInfra
- Pay as you go$5Minimum prepaid top-up; $1 free credit; per-token pricing
- Starter$10/moAbout $12 of usage; limits reset every 5 hours and weekly
- Pro$29/moAbout $35 of usage, higher 5-hour and weekly limits
- Team$99/moAbout $119 of usage, shared by the workspace
- EnterpriseCustomDedicated capacity, RBAC, audit logs, SLA up to 99.99%
Apidog · Key features
- Visual OpenAPI and JSON Schema designer with change history
- Request client for HTTP, GraphQL, gRPC, WebSocket, SOAP and SSE
- Postman-compatible pre and post scripts and database connections
- Visual test scenarios, scheduled runs and performance testing
- Schema-driven smart mocks, cloud mock and self-hosted runner mock
- Interactive API docs with custom domains and free readers
Cons
- Interface is dense and takes time for non-technical users
- Public docs portals are less polished than ReadMe or Mintlify
- Smaller community and plugin ecosystem than Postman
RunInfra · Key features
- OpenAI- and Anthropic-compatible endpoints behind a single API key
- Open models including GLM 5.3, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Qwen3.8 27B
- One-prompt setup for Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, Cline and Droid
- Session-aware routing that keeps agent context cached between calls
- Flat coding plans with 5-hour and weekly usage windows
- Free Standby chat tier when plan limits run out
Cons
- Open models still trail top closed models on hard coding tasks
- Small catalog of eight models
- Starter limits are tight at about $1.11 of usage per 5 hours
Apidog vs RunInfra: FAQ
Which is cheaper, Apidog or RunInfra?
RunInfra starts at $10/mo and Apidog at $12/mo. Both prices are checked on the vendors' own pricing pages.
Do Apidog and RunInfra have a free plan?
Apidog has a free plan. RunInfra has no free plan.